Home > Uncategorized > If we needed another reason to seek the post-oil future

If we needed another reason to seek the post-oil future

November 19, 2007

This story shouldn’t really be a surprise to anyone.  Briefly a 19-year-old Saudi woman was gang-raped, and the seven men are being severely punished with five-year prison sentences.  The woman, however, violated Islamic law by being in a car with a strange man and was given 90 lashes.

What’s that you say?  They tortured her as if she hadn’t already been through enough?  Well you know, she was probably asking for it.  Did you see the way her head scarf was slightly open?  If you think I’m being cruelly cynical, read the letters in response to the BBC article linked below.  Many of them compliment the Saudi court for their right action. Anyway, the story does not end there…

She protested, saying her punishment was excessive.  So the judge increased her sentence to six months in jail and 200 lashes, and punished her lawyer too.  You can read all the details in the links below, along with some interesting little factoids about what it means to be a woman in an Islamic country.  For one thing, it means seeking redress for rape may very well land you in jail, bruised and bleeding.  And then, probably, an outcast for life.

Think about that the next time you fill up your car.  Think about who you’re doing business with.  Forget for a moment the US oil companies and their funding of global-warming denial thinktanks, and remember where they get the oil.  Think about that woman in jail, slowly healing from 200 lashes (does that ever heal) and recovering from the trauma of being gang-raped and then blamed for it (probably never heals) and realize that a good chunk of the proceeds from your credit-card swipe went to the Saudi royal family, to finance Islamism.

And don’t say it isn’t Islamism, that it doesn’t represent Islam.  The Koran is Saudi Arabia’s constitution.  Legal arguments are made in their courts on the basis of Islamic tradition.  Would they have so much power if it weren’t for oil? Do you think for one minute we’d be doing business with these jerks if it weren’t for oil?  Would we be defending them with our military?  Would we be ignoring the fact that 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia?  Would we push the whole damn world to the brink of disaster on their behalf if it weren’t for oil?

This is one place where environmentalism and simple human decency coincide.  It isn’t a plea to give up a technological lifestyle, but it does seem as if some Americans purposely go out of their way to consume more oil than they have to.  That shouldn’t be any more socially acceptable than is drunk driving.  As citizens we can drive the conservation market by consistently making more carbon-frugal choices. 

The post-oil future isn’t going to fall into our laps by accident, but we can help make it happen.  Huge corporations are mindless beasts; they’re not capable of altruism but they’re not inherently evil either.  They just move in the direction of consumer money, the way water flows downhill.  Wave our cash in the right direction and they’ll lumber off toward it.

Consumer choice is only one way to influence corporations – there are other carrots and sticks too.  Time is short: let’s use every tool available to us.

Update: comments closed on this post because some very persistent spammer has found it.  But thank you to all the real commenters below!

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. November 19, 2007 at 08:51 | #1

    You should link to a few video podcasts of Pat Condell’s—he has more than a few choice words for Islamists.

    As far as I’m concerned, Saudi Arabia is as close to True Islam™ as you can get and anybody is free to take this in the spirit it’s intended.

    Once oil runs out in the not too distant future (or more precisely, becomes prohibitively expensive to extract), I doubt things will change for the better for Saudi women. I just wish the U.S. had spent all the money wasted in Iraq and probably soon Iran on energy independence and the not-too-distant post-oil future.

    But like Georg Herweghs said in 1848.

    “Es steht die Welt in Flammen,
    Sie schwatzen noch zusammen…”

    (the world’s aflame and and all they do is talk)

  2. November 19, 2007 at 08:57 | #2

    Not to disagree about the need to get to a post-oil future, but post-oil and post-Saudi are separable concepts.  The reasons for letting the Saudi regime specifically fail are a superset of the reason for reducing oil use generally, as this story illustrates.  Even if they had no oil, this would still be cause for condemnation and ostracism.

  3. November 19, 2007 at 10:15 | #3

    As far as I know, the Saudis are the largest exporter of a particular virulent strain of Islamism and Islamist terror (who were the 9/11 attackers again?). This problem isn’t going to go away once oil runs out and may well be exacerbated by the skyrocketing oil price (anybody noticed Russia flexing muscles recently?). It’s not just the oil, either. Our military-industrial complex needs them to buy our weapons.

    At the end of the day, Saudi Arabia is a medieval society in the worst sense and more than deserves to be called on it. They would benefit greatly from modern civilization—to paraphrase Pat Condell, what’s so great about public executions if you can’t enjoy them with a cold beer?

    I’m just not hopeful that anything will change there for the better.

  4. November 19, 2007 at 10:28 | #4

    I just wish the U.S. had spent all the money wasted in Iraq and probably soon Iran on energy independence and the not-too-distant post-oil future.

    Me too! And oil independence would have done much more to make us safer than killing 1.2 million civilians, creating who knows how many terrorists.

    the world’s aflame and and all they do is talk

    Beautiful quote.

    Even if they had no oil, this would still be cause for condemnation and ostracism.

    No one disagrees with you, but the connection of US Oil Companies to Saudi Arabia is the reason the US doesn’t take action. Like this post stated, 15 of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Who in America cares? No one ever thought of invading Saudi Arabia, or even asking them questions.

    If you want a visual representation of US foreign policy in the Middle East I recommend watching the movie: Syriana. The end of the movie has a great visual metaphor of US involvement in foreign policy. I won’t spoil it for those of you that haven’t seen it.

  5. November 19, 2007 at 10:56 | #5

    I just wish the U.S. had spent all the money wasted in Iraq and probably soon Iran on energy independence and the not-too-distant post-oil future.

    Me three!  This graph provides illustration.

  6. Abhilasha
    November 20, 2007 at 15:18 | #6

    And the most messed up part is that there is no written record for shariyat law….

    its passed from generation to generation orally…so, apparantly you wont even know you are breaking the law unless a judge punishes you for breaking the law…

    Kind of messed up…!!!

    So glad to not be a follower of that “LAW”

Comments are closed.