Google vs. Wikipedia

Had to happen sooner or later

I’ve been extolling the virtues of wikis at work, as our network guru is planning a college-wide tech wiki.  In this process a few people have learned of Wikipedia, the online encyclopaedia which is, I feel, a fantastic resource.  Now Google is gunning for Wikipedia by proposing an online knowledge base of their own.

The system will centre around authored articles created with a tool Google has dubbed “knol” - the word denotes a unit of knowledge - that will make webpages with a distinctive livery to identify them as authoritative. Mr Manber wrote: “A knol on a particular topic is meant to be the first thing someone who searches for this topic for the first time will want to read.”

This can only be a good thing for those of us who enjoy access to vast stores of information.  Just one little quibble… they’re calling the articles “knols”.  Add that to “blog” and “wiki” and a host of other internet-driven words that just sound ridiculous to me for some reason.

Posted by George on 12/15/07 at 02:09 PM
Geeky
  1. Google decides what is authoritative?

    Brittanica tried that before.

    Posted by Ted  on  12/15/07  at  10:46 PM
  2. Nice to see google in the field…

    Posted by Poster Lover  on  12/19/07  at  12:15 AM

Post a comment...

Name - What should we call you? Please use the same name every time.

Email: (won't show)

Location: (optional, but adds context)

Got a website or blog? Want us to know about it? Put 'er here:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?


Type in below, the word you see above:

<< Back to main