Home > Religion > Bin Laden becomes televangelist, invites US to “Embrace Islam”

Bin Laden becomes televangelist, invites US to “Embrace Islam”

September 9, 2007

Osama Bin Laden released another video this week, and it has been confirmed that it was actually him.

I’ve always said that I could find something to agree with from almost anyone:

…he tells the American people that they have failed to persuade the Bush administration to stop the war in Iraq. “You made one of your greatest mistakes, in that you neither brought to account nor punished those who waged this war,” the speaker in the tape says, according to the transcript obtained by ABC News.

“You permitted Bush to complete his first term, and stranger still, chose him for a second term, which gave him a clear mandate from you… to continue to murder our people in Iraq and Afghanistan”.

I agree; that is strange that we let Bush wage war in Iraq.  We had Saddam bottled up and he wasn’t going anywhere.  He certainly wasn’t any threat to us.  We should have kept our focus on Afghanistan where we were going after your sorry ass, Osama.

The speaker tells the American public that there are two ways to end the war in Iraq: “The first is from our side, and it is to continue to escalate the killing and fighting against you.”

The second way, he continues, is to reject America’s democratic system and convert to Islam.

“It has now become clear to you and the entire world the impotence of the democratic system and how it plays with the interest of the peoples and their blood by sacrificing soldiers and populations to achieve the interests of the major corporations”.

“I invite you to embrace Islam,” the speaker says.

And I invite you to eat my shorts, you terrorist pile of swine excrement.  If you wanted to convert the US to Islam, why didn’t you just come here and become an Islamic televangelist?  Aside from being funnier than a troupe of monkeys loose at high tea, you’d have gotten embarrassingly rich.  The Christian televangelists would probably even invite you to their decadent parties.  It isn’t like there’s that much difference between you and them.

Again, the maddening thing is that Osama has a point about corporations making out like bandits while soldiers die in an entirely unnecessary war that makes us LESS secure.  But he didn’t figure that one out on his own.  Neurophilosophy has a link to the whole transcript, noting that the most-wanted terrorist is now a fan of Noam Chomsky.  Apparently during his years of hiding, he’s had time to read up on neurolinguistics – LOL.  Chomsky is an interesting guy, and no fan of Bush, but I doubt he’ll approve Bin Laden’s fan-club application anytime soon. 

Categories: Religion
  1. September 10, 2007 at 12:59 | #1

    I’ve heard great propaganda is a mix of truth and lies.  Bin Laden seems to be doing that rather well here.

    I’ll embrace Islam just as soon as Islam embraces secular humanism.

  2. September 10, 2007 at 20:30 | #2

    “You permitted Bush to complete his first term, and stranger still, chose him for a second term, which gave him a clear mandate from you… to continue to murder our people in Iraq and Afghanistan”.

    Except that the 2nd election was stolen and illegal. Just like the first one.  I don’t see Bush as very different from other dictators.  He even Freudian-slipped that little gem.

  3. September 11, 2007 at 08:18 | #3

    How do you know it was a Freudian slip WeeDram? wink.gif
    But WeeDram, even if the election was stolen why is Bush getting even 40% of the vote?  Why did he still get as close to 50% as he did?  Stolen election or not Bush should not have stood a chance in 04.  Stolen election or not Gore should have never lost his home state.

    The whole article just sucks because Bin Laden is right about America.  I think we as a nation have been way too apathetic to Bush and what he has done.  If Bush invades Iran, are we the American public going to stand by and let him?

  4. September 11, 2007 at 08:53 | #4

    Hey, go easy on Bush: he’s new to this dictator stuff.

  5. Ted
    September 11, 2007 at 11:26 | #5

    If Bush invades Iran, are we the American public going to stand by and let him?

    Yes.

    But “invading” is a stretch. I’m going with “intense bombing campaign”.

Comments are closed.