Home > Uncategorized > Are we afraid of a free press?

Are we afraid of a free press?

December 12, 2010

Ron Paul is a Libertarian/Republican Congressman from Texas. Spend five minutes watching him destroy the criticisms against Julian Assange and Wikileaks. Be sure to stay with it to his questions at the end:

I’ve been trying to make sense of the whole Wikileaks issue and several things stand out. First, the “rape charges” against Assange seem awfully damn convenient: he causes major embarrassment to several governments, and suddenly there’s an international manhunt for him on unrelated crimes. OK, sure; suppose he’s a rapist – that has, exactly, what to do with the US lying its way into the Iraq war, or supporting the Sharia government of Saudi Arabia? (Pop quiz: where did nineteen of the twenty hijackers come from?)

Second, suppose we extradited him here, and imprisoned him or executed him. We couldn’t call ourselves a free country anymore; we’d have to reprint all our stationary. Thomas Jefferson said he’d rather live in a country that had newspapers and not government, than a country with government and no newspapers. And that’s from a guy who’d just helped found a government! But suppose you don’t like Jefferson? At least note that the rest of the Founding Fathers saw fit to put freedom of the press in the very First Amendment.

Third, the criticism could be made that spies or soldiers are in danger because of Wikileaks. And that may be. Of course, we’ve killed somewhere North of a hundred thousand Iraqis (possibly as many as a million), and 4500 US soldiers, not to mention coalition soldiers, contractors, academics, enabled the looting of Iraqi cultural heritage, plus related injuries (which are far in excess of deaths), damaged US/allies relations…

Fourth, and most basic, every politician promises “transparency”, so we can see the inner workings of government. We vote them into office, so let’s not freak out when we find out how the sausage is really made. Put it another way: if your government breaks the law or does something evil, would you want to know? Why or why not?

Fifth, welcome to the new reality. As security expert Bruce Schneier says, Wikileaks is just a website; tomorrow there will be more. Somebody’s always going to spill the beans. Maybe we should stop doing things we need to be embarrassed about. And no, I don’t mean that in a fuzzy, idealistic sense; I mean our government should at least act like everyone will eventually know.

NOTES:

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. December 13, 2010 at 21:30 | #1

    And no, I don’t mean that in a fuzzy, idealistic sense; I mean our government should at least act like everyone will eventually know.

    Look far enough into the future, and everything will become known, assuming the evidence isn’t destroyed while it’s still classified. That’s one of the provisions of our current security law; there’s a mandatory review after twenty-five years, and the object of the review is to determine why it shouldn’t be declassified. There has to be justification, or it will be.

    So far, this doesn’t seem to be enough motivation…

Comments are closed.