Filed under Education

The unexpected disability

How does your state hold up in gifted-education programs?  The states in blue on this map mandate support for education of gifted students, and (crucially) provide funding for that purpose.  On the other extreme are the states in red, which neither require nor fund gifted education.  I am not happy to see where Illinois falls on that continuum.

In an 06 November 2005 Chicago Tribune interview, authors Jan and Bob Davidson (Genius Denied) explain just what’s wrong with spending 143 times more money on special education than on gifted education:

  • Gifted children are often misdiagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorder

  • 10 to 20 percent of high-school dropouts are gifted
  • Many gifted children underachieve to fit in
  • Skipping grades is less harmful than most people realize (when the child already has little in common with his or her age peers)
  • Giftedness crosses socioeconomic lines, but is more noticeable among the wealthy because of funding-enabled challenge
  • Straight-A students are not necessarily gifted; they may simply be very obedient

In the long-run, gifted vs. special-ed funding is not a zero-sum game.  There is an enormous social cost when a gifted student drops out of school, and considerable school funding may be directed at keeping under-challenged kids quiet and in their seats.

The authors also have a Gifted Exchange, and point to two other popular works: A Nation Deceived, (How Schools Hold Back America’s Brightest Students)” and Stand Up For Your Gifted Child.

Why does this matter to me?  My middle and youngest sons both tell me I’m deluded to think schools would, even given the funding, do any better at educating gifted children than they currently do with the majority.  But maybe I’m just an optimist.  I like to believe that, if we made it a priority, we could stop pushing talented kids to the edge of failure in pathologically boring classrooms. 

Maybe we could get curiosity and intellectual drive declared as handicaps, so gifted education would fall under Americans with Disability Act.  Hmmm…

Notes:


  • There’s a discussion of this issue going on over at Mostly Cajun, including some very interesting comments from a Texas special education teacher.

  • I’ve added Catana’s website, the Vorpal Blade to my links column, as she has a strong focus on issues for gifted students and adults.  I hadn’t thought of gifted adults – come to think of it, corporate life isn’t exactly a playground for gifted adults.

Rotten apple for teacher

If you suspected that it’s hard to fire an incompetent schoolteacher, you are right:

The (Small newspaper group) investigation found only 7 percent of the state’s 876 school systems have attempted to fire a tenured teacher since the mid-1980s, when Illinois passed a landmark school-reform act designed to promote teacher accountability. Of those attempts, 62 percent of districts were successful in terminating the tenured educator.

Of the more than 95,000 tenured teachers employed in the state, an average of only two per year are fired for poor job performance, the investigation found. Another five per year on average are dismissed for misconduct.
- State Journal-Register Online, Illinois public schools rarely fire tenured teachers

Well there’s a shocker.  It calls to mind one of my kids’ Spanish teachers, who couldn’t speak (and could barely read) Spanish.  Or another of my kids’ teachers with kids failing her math class who were making A’s in all their other classes, and who claimed the kids were the problem.  Or another of their teachers who humiliated one of my kids’ friends in front of the class for having yellow teeth.  She won “Illinois Teacher of the Year” and received a grant.  Or the science teacher who once told one of my kids that the reason the equator was warmer than the poles is “it’s closer to the sun.”  I could write more examples, and we put only three kids through the system.

The investigators said that strong teacher’s unions and high legal costs “often scare many school districts from getting rid of even the worst tenured teachers.” The investigation is part of a six-part series, unfolding at hiddencostsoftenure.com.  Obviously the investigators have an axe to grind, but it’s damned interesting reading.  I would not think it ‘anti-teacher’ in any way to ask teachers to be good employees, know their subjects, and exercise good professional judgment.

Tenure is a nice idea, and there are a few really brilliant teachers out there who need the protection it offers.  But my experience suggests the reverse is not uncommon; really bad teachers who say, in effect, “What are you going to do?  I have tenure!”

Is it any surprise local school districts and teacher’s unions dispute the study?  Jim Dougherty, president of the Illinois Federation of teachers, said “so few teachers are fired because so few need to be.”

Well there you have it.

E=MC2

Right now I’m watching the NOVA special, Einstein’s Idea, which traces the history of E=MC2 from Faraday to Einstein, and beyond Einstein as it filtered into the world the rest of us know.  A fascinating and frightening chapter emerges in the rise of Nazi Germany, repeating a theme where politics undermined the scientific idea in the execution of Lavoisier in the French revolution.

Narrated by John Lithgow, the show features interviews with physicists and historians, and shows influence of the television series, CSI in its special effects. 

The story is one thread of the Enlightenment held aloft, shining in contrast to the pride of ignorance.  Is there any way to arrange for every high school student in America to see it?  How could we make that happen?


Notes:

  • An hour later, after a shower and snack, I imagine the story as portraying the lens of scientific history focusing Enlightenment physics down to a single point of white-hot energy in the 1905 brain of Albert Einstein, whereupon it again diverges out into the scientific and political reality that is the 20th century.

  • One of the show’s strengths is the way it showed how the development of scientific ideas is throttled by politics, (including scientific politics), helped by Faraday’s unusual religious outlook, and even propelled forward (and then tragically cut short) by the rather racy love life of Emilie du Châtelet.  Also we’re accustomed to thinking of Einstein as a comical but kindly genius – he was actually sort of a jerk.
  • Not sure whether to wish the concluding five minutes (where the narrator ties the story together in a monologue about human inquiry) were less schmaltzy; I found the story exciting enough without that verbage but maybe not everyone would.
  • The show’s explanation of why trans-uranic elements tend toward instability (by imagining the nucleus as a drop of water) and how that insight led to the first confirmation that atoms can split is a wonder of clear exposition.
  • The associated website has a pretty keen educational edge of its own (just click the picture)

That’s our future economy you’re toying with, Mr. President

No time right now for a detailed post, but our president threw large handfuls of monkey-feces at the future of science education in the US yesterday: Bush endorses teaching “Intelligent Design”.

It’s bad enough that enormous chunks of our economy are owned by Saudi and Chinese financiers (that’s what massive deficit spending really means) but we aren’t going to dig out of that hole with a population that has been taught lazy thinking.  And “Gee that’s really complex; God must have done it” is lazy thinking.  It’s the same logic as “I don’t know what causes thunder so it must be Thor’s hammer.”

Unfortunately the Knight-Ridder story linked above gives a free pass to the Discovery Institute’s ID talking-points.  I suppose they’re trying to be “fair” but to me it’s evidence that news agencies should stop hiring people with “journalism” degrees and get people with degrees in real subjects to report the news.

Thanks a lot, Mr. President.


Articles and rants on Bush endorsement of “Intelligent Design”:

A new way to fail

Why didn’t we think of this before?  Instead of telling school kids they’ve “failed” a course, let’s just say instead that they’ve deferred success” so they won’t feel bad.

Really!  As John Hoke said;  “I am not making this [stuff] up.” 

Luckily someone has the sense to call a halt to it.

(I don’t know whether to file this under “Education” or “Stupidity.”  No wonder John uses “Folksonomies” instead of “Categories.”)

Beauty may be only skin deep, but stupidity…

I don’t know what to make of this:

School officials in Victoria, Australia, say it’s too hard for students to calculate equations using the constant 9.8 meters/second/second—the acceleration of gravity at Earth’s surface—so it’s changing the Year 12 physics exam for the Victorian Certificate of Education to use a rounded-off figure of 10 m/s/s.

Close enough? No: “The difference could cause a parachutist or bungie jumper to plummet into the ground, or the launching of a rocket to fail,” say people who actually understand physics.

After hearing the criticism the Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority announced that it would not penalize students who used the correct figure. (Melbourne Herald Sun, Australia)
 
…No penalty for wrong answers, no penalty for the right ones—modern education in a nutshell.

Yes, I know 9.8 m/s2 is not the precise figure, either… but I’m still choking on the idea that students are learning that constants can be rounded off to whole numbers.  What’s next – both e and pi rounded to “3”?

Well, at least the Victoria Museum got it right.

(via James Randi)

Clarity on the cluster

Like most public issues, the evolution/creationism issue is really a cluster of issues that get all cross-linked in discussion so it’s nearly impossible to make progress.  In this case there are layers of scientific, constitutional, pedagogical, philosophical, and religious issues and most discussions bounce around among them.

Here’s one neatly defined philosophical issue from the cluster: “Fairness,” which is a code-word for “Me too!  It’s not fair to give evidence-based science more respect in the classroom than you give our religious myth!”  It’s amazing how far the creationists (and creation-in-drag “Intelligent Design” proponents) have gotten with this whiny tirade, and here’s a delightful answer to it:

“Conservative Christians are demanding that creationism be taught with evolution out of fairness.  I’m all for fairness.  I’ll be happy to let them teach creationism in my science classroom, as soon as they let me teach evolution in their church.”

Marc Bonem, Arlington Heights
Chicago Tribune 11 May ‘05

Lost instruction day

(Skip to the end to find out what it took for me to remove my kids from school for a day…)

The Chicago Tribune reports in Schools would prefer ‘keep your children in class’ day that many school districts will charge students with an unexcused absence if their parents participate in the yearly “Take your sons and daughters to work day.”  The districts are calling it a “lost instruction day.”

The idea behind the event is for kids to see what work is really like.  Since public schools subject kids to twelve years of fake work, resulting in extremely unrealistic expectations, this is a worthy goal.  But the administrators don’t see it that way:

“The concept of having kids shadow and have kids learn what is happening in the workforce is a great idea, but we have to balance that with protecting educational time,” said Lenore Johnson, associate superintendent for instruction in Naperville School District 203. “I think the same things could be accomplished on a non-school day.”

Arizona’s Supt. Tom Horne was more blunt.

“Employers want employees who are conscientious and have good attendance,” he said. “Playing hooky from school is not a good thing and doesn’t prepare you for work.”

Apparently public schools have a monoploy on “educational time.”

Public schools are a study in pedagogical failure.  Will one day either way make a difference?  I mean, a negative difference.  A day outside of public schools, especially learning something about the real world (not filtered by politically correct curriculum committees) could make a world of positive difference.

But I especially like the second one from Tom Horne about playing hooky and proper attendance preparing kids for work.  “Hey kids, someday you’ll have a job that sucks, that you can’t skip a single day of, even for good reason!  You should start getting used to it now!”

I have no doubt the “educators” have talked themselves into believing that what they do every day is the only good thing in their students’ lives, but it just isn’t so.  Parents willing to give more of themselves to their kids can make a bigger difference than all the room-temperature, pureed semi-correct school curriculum in the world.  Maybe there’s another influence behind the admin’s’ reasoning…

School officials say classroom time has become more precious with the passage of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, which holds schools more accountable for student performance on annual achievement tests. Others note that state aid tied to daily attendance figures also is at stake.

Ahh – I get it now.  Not enough kids in class? You take a ding in the budget from state and federal aid.  So the short-sightedness extends to state and federal legislators.  There’s a shocker.

The whole thing started as “take your daughter to work day” to create teachable moments for parents and kids. And while not all workplaces can use it in a positive way, it can be used positively:

The Ms. Foundation estimates that nationwide some 10 million girls and 6 million boys will participate in the event Thursday. The event has moved beyond introducing children to careers, said foundation spokeswoman Cheryl McCants, and now aims to promote family-friendly work environments.

The foundation does not like the idea of moving the day to the summer, McCants said.

“It’s done during the school year because it is an educational program,” McCants said. “The premise behind the program is that the children who participate can go back and share the experience and make the connection between what takes place in school and what takes place in the workplace. That works best during the school year.”

But many school officials believe kids are better off in the classroom. Last year, the Minneapolis Public School system warned parents that absences would not be excused. The policy was reversed this year when a new superintendent took office, said district spokesman Josh Collins.

“We are still encouraging our parents to keep their children in school,” Collins said …

“It was a lost instruction day,” said school board President Kathleen Baldwin. “I really have a problem with the fact that this is something that could be done during the summer months instead of taking them out of their education setting.”

Hey, there it was again: the “education setting” is the school.  Education can’t take place anywhere else.  Parents certainly can’t educate their kids – that requires professional “educators.”

What did it take for me to haul my kids out of school for a day?

Many years ago there was a total eclipse of the sun in our own county.  My 3 kids were in grade school at the time, and the school district, instead of using this once-in-a-lifetime event for instruction, decided to keep everyone indoors with the blinds down.  Really.

I bought the correct grade of welding-mask filter for safely viewing the sun, and also built a solar-eclipse projector for safely viewing projected images of the event.  On the day of the eclipse, I took my kids out of school and drove them 50 miles south to the center of the event.

It was a strange and wonderful thing to see.  The sun was nibbled away, became a dark-centered ring, and then opened back up to its own brilliant self.  At the height of the eclipse, thousands of eclipse-images were projected on the ground through every little hole in tree leaves.  No wonder ancient people were so awed by eclipses.

I couldn’t say if it made an impression on my kids or not – they may not even remember it but I tried, damn it.  Parents are willing to try to do something beyond daily input+output=production for their kids.

Kim Stanley, 39, of Naperville, a former account manager for AT&T who is now a stay-at-home mother of two girls, called her school district’s non-support of the day “astonishing.”

“This is about progress,” she said. “It’s about exposing your kids to as much opportunity as you can.”

For many kids, school is nothing more than a grinding endurance test. For one day, let’s at least try something different.

Bill Gates gives educators a clue

“America’s high schools are obsolete.  By ‘obsolete,’ I don’t just mean that they’re broken, flawed, or underfunded, though a case could be made for every one of those points.  By obsolete, I mean our high schools – even when they’re working as designed – cannot teach all our students what they need to know today.”
- Bill Gates at the National Education Summit in Washington D.C. Feb ‘05

I wish the newspaper would have included the complete text of Gates’ comments, which I could not find.  What is it kids need to know?  Quadratic equations?  The capital city of Pakistan?  What?

I’m convinced kids need to know how to fail…

… and what it takes to succeed.  Check this from UTI:

We already have some pretty sad stats in science and math in this country. Students from India, Pakistan, Turkey, Iran, are coming here in droves and kicking American student’s asses in math and science. I know, I used to teach calculus. The foreign students from those nations just walk all over our students. (Those foriegn devils employ a dastardly and unfair set of tactics to blow the grading curve for American students using any or all of “Going to class regularly, taking good notes, doing all homework, availing themselves of instructor office hours and asking for help when they’re stuck, and studying”. American students have been unable to crack this code in large numbers)
- DarkSyd

What do kids in high school need to know?  Charles J. Sykes, author of Dumbing Down Our Kids has a good list, often erroneously attributed to Bill Gates himself:

Rules for Life

Rule 1: Life is not fair. Get used to it.

Rule 2: The world won’t care about your self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself.

Rule 3: You will NOT make $40,000 a year right out of high school. You won’t be a vice-president with a car phone, until you earn both.

Rule 4: If you think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss. He doesn’t have tenure.

Rule 5: Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your grandparents had a different word for burger flipping; they called it opportunity.

Rule 6: If you mess up, it’s not your parents’ fault. Don’t whine about your mistakes—learn from them.

Rule 7: Before you were born, your parents weren’t as boring as they are now. They got that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes and listening to you talk about how “cool” you are. So before you save the rain forest from the parasites of your parents’ generation, try “delousing” the closet in your own room.

Rule 8: Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life has not. In some schools they have abolished failing grades; they’ll give you as many times as you want to get the right answer. This doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life.

Rule 9: Life is not divided into semesters. You don’t get summers off and very few employers are interested in helping you find yourself. Do that on your own time.

Rule 10: Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to leave the coffee shop and go to jobs.

Rule 11: Be nice to nerds. Chances are you’ll end up working for one.

Here’s a couple more:
(I’ve linked to both of these before but bring them up again because they’re so good)

Paul Graham’s essay, Things I wish I had known

Steven Yates’ essay, How I Survived Government Schools

So what will come out of that conference in Washington?  I have a sick feeling it will be some 800-page document for everyone to ignore, and maybe eventually an “Office of” something-or-other.