Google vs. Wikipedia

I’ve been extolling the virtues of wikis at work, as our network guru is planning a college-wide tech wiki.  In this process a few people have learned of Wikipedia, the online encyclopaedia which is, I feel, a fantastic resource.  Now Google is gunning for Wikipedia by proposing an online knowledge base of their own.

The system will centre around authored articles created with a tool Google has dubbed “knol” – the word denotes a unit of knowledge – that will make webpages with a distinctive livery to identify them as authoritative. Mr Manber wrote: “A knol on a particular topic is meant to be the first thing someone who searches for this topic for the first time will want to read.”

This can only be a good thing for those of us who enjoy access to vast stores of information.  Just one little quibble… they’re calling the articles “knols”.  Add that to “blog” and “wiki” and a host of other internet-driven words that just sound ridiculous to me for some reason.

2 thoughts on “Google vs. Wikipedia

  1. Ted says:

    Google decides what is authoritative?

    Brittanica tried that before.

  2. Poster Lover says:

    Nice to see google in the field…